Paper Submission

---

All submissions must include a cover page with title, abstract (200 words), author details, Affiliation, and 6 keywords. The full paper/extended abstract/abstract should follow a standard research structure: Introduction, Literature Review, Methodology, and Expected Contributions.

Paper Submission Link

Authors' Duties:

• Authors should present an accurate account of the work performed and discuss its significance objectively.
• Authors must submit only entirely original works and appropriately cite or quote any influential prior publications.
• Authors should note that the acceptable plagiarism limit for publication is 10%. Authors should keep the similarity below 10%.
• Authors should disclose any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that could influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript.
• Authors should follow research ethics, and malpractices will be viewed seriously.

Review Process:

• Initially, the research paper will be checked to determine whether it is within the scope of the conference. If the paper is within the scope of the conference theme, it will undergo a double-blind peer review.
• The suitable papers identified in the initial checks will undergo a double-blind peer review.
• The reviewers will be from across the world. We will follow the policy of double-blind peer review, and the deadline for the reviewers to complete the review will be 20 days.
• Once the recommendations from the reviewers are received, these suggestions will be checked by the editors first. If the manuscript is evaluated rigorously and the suggested changes are suitable, the recommendations will be provided to the authors. If the manuscript review is not proper, it will be sent for another round of review to another reviewer.
• Once the author(s) receive the reviews, they will be expected to submit the revised manuscript within the next 15 days. Once the recommendations from reviewers are implemented by the authors, it will be checked by the editors. If the changes made are suitable, the manuscript will be sent to the reviewers again for their satisfaction.
• Upon satisfactory feedback from the reviewer, the acceptance note will be sent to the authors.
• If any further peer review is required, the paper will again undergo the peer review process. After the peer review process and manuscript update by the author(s), the acceptance note will be issued to the authors.
• The total time required for this process will be around 2 months, and in some cases, it might be longer depending on the number of reviews.
• If the author fails to make the necessary changes suggested by the reviewers, the paper will be rejected.
• Upon the acceptance of the manuscript, the authors will be required to submit the manuscript in the proper format of Taylor and Francis/journal. If the author fails to submit the manuscript in the proper format of Taylor and Francis or the journal, the paper will be rejected, and it will not be the responsibility of the conference organizers. The conference organizers will give time to the authors to update the manuscript in the format decided by the journal/conference proceedings.

Editors' Responsibilities:

• The editor is responsible for deciding which papers will be published and evaluating them objectively based on importance, originality, clarity, and relevance to the conference's scope, i.e., sustainability, resilience, value creation, and innovation in business practices.
• The editor and editorial staff must maintain confidentiality and not disclose information about submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the authors and publisher.
• The editor should avoid conflicts of interest. Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted paper must not be used for the editor's or editorial board's own research without the author's written consent.

Reviewers' Responsibilities:

• The peer-review process should assist the editor in making publication decisions and help the author improve the paper.
• Reviewers who feel unqualified or know their prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and withdraw from the review process.
• Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents.
• If the reviewer(s) realize that the manuscript is not from their area or is from someone they know, it should be brought to the attention of the editor. In this case, the manuscript will be sent to another reviewer.
• Reviewers should conduct objective reviews and avoid personal criticism of the author. Their feedback should express views clearly with supporting arguments.

Publication Opportunity:

• All accepted papers of any length will be published in an open access conference proceedings bearing ISSN number published by Atlantis Press- A part of Springer Nature (will be sent for indexing).
• Authors also have the chance to publish in reputed international journals indexed in SCOPUS, ABDC, and WoS etc (Publication cost to be born by the authors, if applicable).